?

Log in

No account? Create an account

« previous entry | next entry »
Wed, Jan. 2nd, 2008 | 06:09 pm  slavezombie


bunnysuicide
slavezombie
illustration
2nd January, 2008 ©
Today's blanket sin
In chapter 7, page 149, 3rd ¶, of The shock doctrine,, some history from bygone days when I didn't know what was going on in the world, at Belmont High. Fast times.
I guess what really cracks me up about this paragraph, which I need to go back in and edit because my typing skills at 100WPM aren't what they use to be, is the formula for calculating the average wage. I know I'm being critical about it, but who's to say that minorities shouldn't be counted in with the rest of the population when doing the math?


NAOMI
The minimum wage never recovered its value and 2 years into the program, real wages were down 40 %; at one point they would drop 70%. In 1985, the year of shock therapy, the per capita average income in Bolivia was $845; 2 years later it had fallen to $789. This is the measure used by Sachs and the government, and despite the lack of progress it conveys, it does not begin to capture the degradation of daily life for many bolivians. Average income is derived by adding up the country's total income and dividing by the number of people in the country; it glosses over the fact that shock therapy in Bolivia had the same effects that it had in the rest of the region: a small elite grew far wealthier while large portions of what had been the working class were discarded from the economy altogether and turned into surplus people. In 1987, Bolivian peasants, known as campesinos, were earning, on average, just $140 a year, less than one-fifth of the "average income." That is the problem with measuring only the "average": it effectively erases these sharp divisions.
A mouthful, but I think I better re-read this and make more sense out of it before I analyze it. Word problems were always hell for me in school too.


LinkCommentFile under memories

Comments {3}

For Non Blondes aka U-nIn-9-sIx-6

webſite

from: uninesix
date: Thu, Jan. 3, 2008 12:51 am (UTC)
Link

I am so waiting to get that book. I love her reporting and writing.

Reply | Thread

Bier de Stone

Page 163 "The debt shock"

from: slavezombie
date: Thu, Jan. 3, 2008 11:42 pm (UTC)
Link

Yeah, she's pretty good. I swear she writes like a man. I'm taking this book everywhere I go because paragraphs like the one above just get so technical, I've got to simplify them by dismantling them clause by clause. Here's another note I took today at Portos.
The IMF and World Bank… allocated power by… "one country, one vote" similarly… like the UN General Assembly… but on the size of each country`s economy—. Their administration… harnessed [Europe & Japan…] for their own needs… to turn (them) into primary vehicles for advancing corporate crusade.

Reply | Parent | Thread

For Non Blondes aka U-nIn-9-sIx-6

Re: Page 163 "The debt shock"

from: uninesix
date: Fri, Jan. 4, 2008 12:07 am (UTC)
Link

Here's an interview with her from Truthout.org:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/122807J.shtml

You might also like reading Paul Krugman's op/ed articles from the NYTimes as clipped by Truthout.org:
http://www.google.com/custom?q=%22Paul+Krugman%22&cof=S%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.truthout.org%3BGL%3A0%3BAH%3Acenter%3BLH%3A45%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.truthout.org%2Fimgs.site_01%2F1.LGO.search_1.gif%3BLW%3A455%3BAWFID%3A3525fa9668c9622d%3B&domains=www.truthout.org&sitesearch=www.truthout.org
He's a Princeton proffessor-economist who actually makes socio-econ. issues totally readable, w/out dumbing it down.

Reply | Parent | Thread